🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <11561@sun13.scri.fsu.edu> chrisg@cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com
(Chris Green) writes:

>	Has anyone ever attempted to take advantage of the
>"infinite-frame-rate" of raster scan devices, particularly video?  What
>I mean by this to render your animation with the knowledge that each
>pixel is (for instance) 35ns later than the preceeding pixel, and that
>each scan-line is ~63uS later than the preceeding one. Given
>appropriate temporal filtering, and a general enough 4-d ray-tracer,
>shouldn't this provide a potential for improved quality? Is anyone
>familiar with any research or applications of this? I'm familiar with
>Don Mitchell's paper on interlace and chroma filtering for video.

Take a look at "Device Dependent Image Construction for Computer
Graphics", RV Klassen, Research Report CS-91-19, Department of Computer
Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.  

Victor looks at how to minimize the discrepancies between a desired
image and the image generated by a display device, given a model of the
spatial and temporal intensity profiles of the device (my rough
paraphrase of one aspect of the thesis.  If I'm really not doing it
justice, I hope he'll correct me.)
--
Blair MacIntyre --- bm@cs.columbia.edu --- CS Department, Columbia University

"Men can get into shaving, because it reminds them of what stud hombres
they are, having to tame their manliness on a regular basis." - Dave Barry

--
Moderated by SCRI Vis <>           Submissions to: graphics@scri1.scri.fsu.edu
Guy, John R. Murray   <> Administrivia to: graphics-request@scri1.scri.fsu.edu