Article View: comp.groupware
Article #163Re: Why is a replicated DB a lose??
From: consensus
Date: Sat, 02 Jun 1990 21:09
Date: Sat, 02 Jun 1990 21:09
38 lines
1582 bytes
1582 bytes
The following reply is from the Groupware SIG on America Online. For more information, or to reply to an individual on America Online, contact: * Christopher Allen - Consensus Development * P.O. Box 2836, Union City, CA 94587-7836 * AT&T: (415) 487-9206 * America Online: AFL MacDev * AppleLink: D3516 * Internet: cdp!consensus@arisia.xerox.com * UUCP: uunet!pyramid!cdp!consensus **** Subj: What is it, anyway? 90-04-25 01:38:56 EDT From: Shep T Even after reading this entire thread, I'm still not too clear on what Notes is all about. It takes documents from around the net and feeds them to you based on criteria (forms) that you've previously set up? Is this correct? What am I missing? Subj: Lotus Notes 90-04-25 16:39:54 EDT From: AFL MacDev I think the briefest summary is that it is similar to their single user product, Lotus Agenda, except it is multiuser, costs 62K, and has more bells and whistles. I haven't seen it personally, yet. But I hope to before the Electronic Networking Assocation conference in May. Chris Allen - AFL MacDev
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1138200007@cdp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!occrsh!uokmax!apple!bionet!arisia!cdp!consensusReferences:
<6484@becker.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!occrsh!uokmax!apple!bionet!arisia!cdp!consensus From: consensus@cdp.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.groupware Subject: Re: Why is a replicated DB a lose?? Message-ID: <1138200007@cdp> Date: 2 Jun 90 21:09:00 GMT References: <6484@becker.uucp> Lines: 38 Nf-ID: #R:becker.uucp:6484:cdp:1138200007:000:1146 Nf-From: cdp.UUCP!consensus Jun 2 14:09:00 1990