🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <WEX.90Jul6115019@sitting.pws.bull.com> wex@sitting.pws.bull.com (Buckaroo Banzai) writes:
>Let's try this:  Kevin, which (if any) of the three calendars and associated
>functions would you be willing to have automated (assuming the relevant
>persons - wife, secretary, you, etc.) had access to the same online
>calendar.

Alan, after reading my post it struck me that although I would like to
try it (putting all three up and open to the various people) I still
want to be able to control who has access to each schedule and for the
private schedule I still want to exercise the final say in what goes
in.  I guess what I'm saying is that I'd accept a temporary "pencilled"
in appointment but I reserve the right to accept or not accept the
suggestion.

Oh well, I'll probably miss a whole bunch of this discussion now since
I'm going on holidays for about 4 weeks.  If anyone would like to keep
me up to date by mailing stuff to me I'd be very grateful.  Please only
one person mail things.  There see!!!!, I've just opened up a psuedo
scheduler in the public arena -- no problem at all.  Just don't tell me
that I have to be at a meeting on August 3 at 8:30 a.m. in Palo Alto or
some such place.

:-)
Kevin
-- 
Kevin "auric" Crocker Athabasca University 
UUCP: ...!{alberta,ncc,attvcr}!atha!kevinc
Inet: kevinc@cs.AthabascaU.CA