Article View: comp.groupware
Article #307Re: Consensus Journals:Nonexistent journals based upon peer consensus
From: Jim Underwood
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 1990 03:46
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 1990 03:46
26 lines
1549 bytes
1549 bytes
cox@stpstn.UUCP (Brad Cox) writes: >In article >27172@cs.yale.edu> yarvin-norman@cs.yale.edu (Norman Yarvin) writes: ><dsstodol@daimi.aau.dk (David S. Stodolsky) writes: ><> A statistical ><>procedure is used to identify the most ><>knowledgeable representative of each ><>consensus position... >< ><Then your method is complete crap. >Does anyone else find this retort as offensive as I do? Sorry Brad! It seems fair enough comment to me. "Consensus" means "agreement of opinion on the part of all concerned" (OED) How do you expect to represent this statistically ??????? ______________________________________________________________________________ Jim Underwood University of Technology, Sydney (jim@ultima.socs.uts.edu.au) PO Box 123, BROADWAY Systems Theorist N.S.W. 2007 School of Computing Sciences AUSTRALIA ______________________________________________________________________________
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<18637@ultima.socs.uts.edu.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!uhccux!munnari.oz.au!metro!cluster!ultima!jimReferences:
<1990Nov8.181047.17406@daimi.aau.dk> <27172@cs.yale.edu> <5802@stpstn.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!uhccux!munnari.oz.au!metro!cluster!ultima!jim From: jim@ultima.socs.uts.edu.au (Jim Underwood) Newsgroups: comp.groupware Subject: Re: Consensus Journals:Nonexistent journals based upon peer consensus Message-ID: <18637@ultima.socs.uts.edu.au> Date: 20 Nov 90 03:46:09 GMT References: <1990Nov8.181047.17406@daimi.aau.dk> <27172@cs.yale.edu> <5802@stpstn.UUCP> Organization: SOCS, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia Lines: 26