🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.groupware
Article #47

Re: Collaborative Architectural Design

#47
From: tmn Douglass Carmichael
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1992 11:26
19 lines
977 bytes
        David, i would love to agree, but
open and closed are not absolute, only
tendencies, and there is fair evidence that
a fairly closed system is likely to generate
more income than an open one, because
the majority of players benefit from the
more closed approach. My hospital
example still stands as  a paradigm for
semi closed `participatory design" that  is
likely to emerge as the groupware style,
like pollsters questions, they can only get
back what they ask forced into a
distribution curve of at times dubious
relevance. And this can make lots of
money. market forces will not guarantee a
more humane groupware world.
---------
Douglass Carmichael  703-243-6622 carmike@tmn.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <179280010@pandora>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!nntp1.radiomail.net!fernwood!pandora!tmn!carmike

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: tmn_ <Douglass Carmichael <carmike@t>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!nntp1.radiomail.net!fernwood!pandora!tmn!carmike
Date:  10 Aug 92 11:26:00
Subject: Re:  Collaborative Architectural Design
Newsgroups: comp.groupware
Message-ID: <179280010@pandora>
Lines: 20