Article View: comp.groupware
Article #47Re: Collaborative Architectural Design
From: tmn Douglass Carmichael
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1992 11:26
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1992 11:26
19 lines
977 bytes
977 bytes
David, i would love to agree, but
open and closed are not absolute, only
tendencies, and there is fair evidence that
a fairly closed system is likely to generate
more income than an open one, because
the majority of players benefit from the
more closed approach. My hospital
example still stands as a paradigm for
semi closed `participatory design" that is
likely to emerge as the groupware style,
like pollsters questions, they can only get
back what they ask forced into a
distribution curve of at times dubious
relevance. And this can make lots of
money. market forces will not guarantee a
more humane groupware world.
---------
Douglass Carmichael 703-243-6622 carmike@tmn.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<179280010@pandora>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!nntp1.radiomail.net!fernwood!pandora!tmn!carmikeShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: tmn_ <Douglass Carmichael <carmike@t> Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!nntp1.radiomail.net!fernwood!pandora!tmn!carmike Date: 10 Aug 92 11:26:00 Subject: Re: Collaborative Architectural Design Newsgroups: comp.groupware Message-ID: <179280010@pandora> Lines: 20