Article View: comp.groupware
Article #603Re: Any experience with Lotus Notes
From: Jim Carroll
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 12:00
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 12:00
47 lines
2822 bytes
2822 bytes
s19184@seb.se (Michael Evans @ S-E-Banken, Sweden) once wrote....
>In article <gate.8sNwXB1w165w@sytex.com>, keith@sytex.com (Keith Attenborough)
> writes:
>> I don't have any experience yet, but my organization is working on
>> installing Notes to support all the document form stuff -- papers,
>> memos, position documents, images, etc. we use on a daily basis. One of
>> the key features we were looking for and believe Notes provides is
>> support for workflow management, the ability to use the system to route
>> material to the corrct people for review and editing, then ensuring that
>> it is really those individuals who have done the work. It seems
>> designed to handle those tasks well.
>
>Unless things have changed since autumn 1992, then I am not sure that
>Lotus Notes is designed to handle more formal worksflows well.
>
>We had a good look at the functions and found that it was missing
>monitoring process times, escalation generically through the
>organisation (if he takes too long dealing with this case, signal his
>manager), split & join parallel activities etc.
>
>Of course, we could have implemented these functions, but then it
>would have been OUR implementation, and not the standard Lotus
>implementation which future Notelets would use.
>
>I may be wrong, I which case I am very interested of your experiences,
>or I may have the wrong definition of workflow processing, in which
>case I stand to be corrected.
>
I'm very intrigued by the components of workflow that you mention; such
as monitoring process times, escalation etc. in the paragraph above. I would
be very interested in a list of such issues, i.e that would make up a
full and complete workflow system. If you have any references to articles
that refer to such components as well, that would be most useful
Are these things well defined, or are they still being defined as worklow/
rules based processing continues to mature...?
jc
----
____ ___ ___ Jim Carroll, J.A. Carroll Consulting
/ /\ / / _____________________________________
/ /__\/ / Internet jcarroll@jacc.com
\__/ / \___\___ Voice or Fax +1.416.855.2950
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
(in the suburbs of Toronto)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7-PCNews-124beta@jacc.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!uunet.ca!jacc!jcarrollReferences:
<gate.8sNwXB1w165w@sytex.com> <1993Jan25.223718.1@seb.se>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!uunet.ca!jacc!jcarroll From: jcarroll@jacc.com (Jim Carroll) Reply-To: jcarroll@jacc.com Newsgroups: comp.groupware Subject: Re: Any experience with Lotus Notes Message-ID: <7-PCNews-124beta@jacc.com> Date: 26 Jan 93 12:0:46 GMT Organization: J.A.CarrollConsulting References: <gate.8sNwXB1w165w@sytex.com> <1993Jan25.223718.1@seb.se> Lines: 48