🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.groupware
Article #603

Re: Any experience with Lotus Notes

#603
From: Jim Carroll
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 12:00
47 lines
2822 bytes
s19184@seb.se (Michael Evans @ S-E-Banken, Sweden) once wrote....
>In article <gate.8sNwXB1w165w@sytex.com>, keith@sytex.com (Keith Attenborough)
>   writes:
>> I don't have any experience yet, but my organization is working on
>> installing Notes to support all the document form stuff -- papers,
>> memos, position documents, images, etc. we use on a daily basis.  One of
>> the key features we were looking for and believe Notes provides is
>> support for workflow management, the ability to use the system to route
>> material to the corrct people for review and editing, then ensuring that
>> it is really those individuals who have done the work.  It seems
>> designed to handle those tasks well.
>
>Unless things have changed since autumn 1992, then I am not sure that 
>Lotus Notes is designed to handle more formal worksflows well.
>
>We had a good look at the functions and found that it was missing 
>monitoring process times, escalation generically through the 
>organisation (if he takes too long dealing with this case, signal his 
>manager), split & join parallel activities etc.
>
>Of course, we could have implemented these functions, but then it 
>would have been OUR implementation, and not the standard Lotus 
>implementation which future Notelets would use.
>
>I may be wrong, I which case I am very interested of your experiences, 
>or I may have the wrong definition of workflow processing, in which 
>case I stand to be corrected.
>

I'm very intrigued by the components of workflow that you mention; such
as monitoring process times, escalation etc. in the paragraph above. I would
be very interested in a list of such issues, i.e that would make up a
full and complete workflow system. If you have any references to articles
that refer to such components as well, that would be most useful

Are these things well defined, or are they still being defined as worklow/
rules based processing continues to mature...?

jc

----
        ____     ___ ___       Jim Carroll, J.A. Carroll Consulting
          / /\  /   /          _____________________________________
         / /__\/   /           Internet            jcarroll@jacc.com 
     \__/ /    \___\___        Voice or Fax        +1.416.855.2950   
                                  Mississauga, Ontario, Canada                                                
                                  (in the suburbs of Toronto)
Technical Details
Message-ID: <7-PCNews-124beta@jacc.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!uunet.ca!jacc!jcarroll
References: <gate.8sNwXB1w165w@sytex.com> <1993Jan25.223718.1@seb.se>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!uunet.ca!jacc!jcarroll
From: jcarroll@jacc.com (Jim Carroll)
Reply-To: jcarroll@jacc.com
Newsgroups: comp.groupware
Subject: Re: Any experience with Lotus Notes
Message-ID: <7-PCNews-124beta@jacc.com>
Date: 26 Jan 93 12:0:46 GMT
Organization: J.A.CarrollConsulting
References: <gate.8sNwXB1w165w@sytex.com> <1993Jan25.223718.1@seb.se>
Lines: 48