🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <40068@ames.arc.nasa.gov> lamaster@ames.arc.nasa.gov (Hugh LaMaster) writes:
|In article <5401@levels.sait.edu.au> CCML@levels.sait.edu.au (Martin) writes:
|
|>book 'Understanding Computers and Cognition'.  In this work, Winograd
|>and Flores argue that there is no objective world which can be measured.
|>Rather, that the world is created through the language which we use to
|>communicate.
|
|Did they *really* say this?  If so, it would be an example of relativism of
|the worst sort.  I thought better of T. Winograd.  It reminds me of Edward
|Abbey's "Test".  If someone says they are a solopsist, throw a brick at
|their head.  It they duck, they are a liar.  Is the brick "created through
|the language which we use to communicate"?  Or is it a real, objective, brick?

	Ho, ho, this is droll.

	If someone says they are an objectivist, throw a brick at
	their head. If they duck, ignore them.

-- 
  \\\\	 Bruce Becker	Toronto, Ont.
w \66/	 Internet: bdb@becker.UUCP, bruce@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu
 `/v/-e	 BitNet:   BECKER@HUMBER.BITNET
_<  \_	 "Head-slam me, Jesus, on the turnbuckle of life" - Godzibo