🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.groupware
Article #687

Re: Trying a self-moderating posting scheme

#687
From: David Stodolsky
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1990 19:37
60 lines
2663 bytes
[posted to: expnet@ncoast.uucp]

davidsen%hal@crdos1.crd.ge.com writes:

>  If someone likes a posting, particularly a controversial one, they
>*reply* to the control program with a single line message saying BRAVO.
>If they don't like it they reply "B_LLSH_T." The moderator program
>applies a weighting scheme to the votes so one poster or site can't
>censor another poster. The update program regularly weights the postings
>of each poster and site, and mails a "report card" back to the poster.

In addition to a report card, how about a "request card" or "invitation to 
contribute." After reading an article you return a vector of responses chosen 
from:

1:BRAVO
2:Addition needed
3:Correction needed
4:Do not understand
5:Not serious
6:False
7:Disagree
8:Original
9:Irrelevant

The descriptions chosen could be placed on a single line like:

68 

That is, "Irrelevant, False".

If a lot of readers returned this opinion and a lot returned:

28

"Original, correction needed." 

Then it would be interesting to invite the best author from each group to post 
an article.

The "best" author is defined as the most central in their group. "Most 
central" can be computed mathematically, using the "Cultural Consensus Model". 
For a small experiment, an editor could just look over the pattern of 
responses and invite a couple of people to post an article supporting their 
opinions.

The effect is that the best informed supporter of each opinion is invited to 
contribute. Authors can get reports on each of their articles.  Readers can 
receive reports on the quality of each of their judgments. This approach also 
has the advantage of token passing, which avoids a duplication of effort. That 
is, several responses that say more or less the same thing, do not get written 
simultaneously, and therefore, do not have to be read.


-- 
David S. Stodolsky, PhD                Internet: david@harald.ruc.dk
Department of Psychology                       :      stodol@diku.dk
Copenhagen Univ., Njalsg. 88                 Voice: + 45 31 58 48 86
DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark                  Fax: + 45 31 54 32 11
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1990Feb15.193709.24275@diku.dk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!sunic!dkuug!freja!stodol

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!sunic!dkuug!freja!stodol
From: stodol@diku.dk (David Stodolsky)
Newsgroups: comp.groupware,news.groups,news.admin
Subject: Re: Trying a self-moderating posting scheme
Keywords: invitational journals Cultural Consensus token passing review
Message-ID: <1990Feb15.193709.24275@diku.dk>
Date: 15 Feb 90 19:37:09 GMT
Organization: Department Of Computer Science, University Of Copenhagen
Lines: 60