Thread View: comp.groupware
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Rob Kling
Sun, 16 Aug 1992 20:14
Incorporating Org Behaviour into Systems Analysis
Author: Rob Kling
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1992 20:14
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1992 20:14
168 lines
8429 bytes
8429 bytes
A couple of people who have read or scanned "Behind
the Terminal: The Critical Role of Computing Infrastructure In
Effective Information Systems' Development and Use" have
characterized some of the arguments as misrepresenting
"traditional" methods of systems analysis. I don't use
the term "traditional" when referring to a relatively narrow
form of systems analysis (which I call "discrete entity
models.").
Discrete entity models *do not* treat computerized
systems as only the physical system, but they do focus on
formal organizational goals, resources, and reporting
relationships. (see below). DE models do emphasize information
engineering.
I'm extracting (below)
the characterization of discrete entity models and socially
richer web models form the paper so that readers can better see
the characterizations that I do make. These models are
both "ideal types."
I suspect that most critics of the paper would like to see
organizationally/socially rich forms of systems analysis in
practice. I strongly agree with this sentiment. Some of the
information engineering representations, such as dataflow
diagrams, can be helpful. But they don't go far enough.
We seem to differ, in part, on what systems analysis methods are
frequently taught in universities and the nature (and diversity)
of common practices in *end user* organizations today. The high
end of practice is often very socially attuned. Unfortunately,
less socially sensitive approaches also still seem to be
common.
In response to my posting, I received several supportive
messages, including one from a manager whose organization is
going through a " business process redesign effort using a tool
called IDEF (Integration Definition Language). The premise
behind it is that we first model the organization from the
strategic level, incorporating all critical mission elements and
goals into the analysis of existing functions. ..... This
approach does not take into account physical contraints and
social relationships ..." This seems much closer to a discrete
entity approach than a web approach.
I encourage net readers who find this contrast useful to print
and read the article (rather than trying to comprehend it
through online scanning).
I would also be interested in learning of any good cases
which can be used to help teach organizationally/socially
rich forms of systems analysis.
Best wishes,
Rob Kling
UC-Irvine
========================================
Table 1
Assumptions of Discrete-Entity Models
D1. A computing resource is best conceptualized as a particular
piece of equipment, application, or technique which provides
specifiable information processing capabilities.
a. Each computing resource has costs and skill requirements
which are largely identifiable.
b. Computer-based technologies are tools, and are socially
neutral.
D2. Role of Infrastructure:
a. The infrastructure for supporting the focal computing
resource and the organizational procedures by which it is
organized and sustained are critical elements.
b. Each computer-based service is provided through a set of
structured computing resources and organized
infrastructure. Deploying, managing, and setting
procedures for these infrastructural resources is
separable from deployment of the focal computer-based
technology. Infrastructure, either technical or
administrative, is a neutral resource.
c. "Human factors" must be taken into account to ensure that
people are well trained and motivated to do what is
required. But "human factors" are "organizational
problems" which are separable from "technical problems."
D3. Control over Infrastructure: Organizations have ample
resources to support all of their computing developments and
uses simultaneously. Elements of infrastructure are necessary
for making the equipment or technique available to developers
or users, and they can be counted on to be of adequate quality
and available as necessary.
D4. The focal computing resource and any element of infrastructure
can be analyzed independently of:
a. its interactions with other computing resources;
b. the social or organizational arrangements within which
computer-based services are developed and provided
(infrastructure and macrostructures).
D5. Social Action:
a. Organizational behavior is best described by the formal
goals, procedures, and administrative arrangements of the
acting units.
b. The use of a computing resource is best described by its
formal purposes and features.
==================================================
Table 2 -- Assumptions of Web Models
W1. A computer system is best conceptualized as an ensemble of
equipment, applications, and techniques with identifiable
information processing capabilities.
a. Each computing resource has costs and skill requirements
which are only partially identifiable.
b. In addition to its functional capabilities as an
information processing tool, computer-based technologies
are also social objects which may be highly charged with
meaning.
W2. Role of Infrastructure:
a. The infrastructure for supporting the focal computing
resource and the organizational procedures by which it is
organized and sustained are critical elements.
b. Each computer-based service is provided through a set of
structured computing resources and organized
infrastructure. This organization of essential resources
makes computer-based systems into a form of social
organization. Like any organization or institution, it is
not necessarily neutral.
c. There is no "human factor" which is specially separable
from the delivery of computer-based information services.
Much of the development and routine operations of
computer-based technologies hinge on many human judgments
and actions carried out within complex, organized social
settings.
W3. Control over Infrastructure:
a. Organizations have limited resources. Not all necessary
infrastructural resources are available (in adequate
quality) as needed.
b. Computer-using organizations rarely have complete
administrative or political control over all their
requisite infrastructure. Infrastructural resources may
be spread across several organizational units or
nominally independent organizations.
W4. The information processing leverage provided by a focal
computing resource, and its other costs and benefits, social
and economic, are contingent upon:
a. its interactions with other computing resources;
b. the social or organizational arrangements within which
computer-based services are developed and provided
(infrastructure and macrostructures).
W5. Social Action:
Political interests, structural constraints, and participants
definitions of their situations often influence organizational
action. Use naturalistic open systems organizational model,
such as a negotiated order or institutional model of social
activities, to best describe the social relations among key
participants.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads