Article View: comp.ibm.pc.hardware
Article #10Re: Optimizing 386SX-16's for Windows
From: tsuanian
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 06:23
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 06:23
56 lines
2863 bytes
2863 bytes
In article <Bsu89r.3K6@cs.dal.ca>, goldrick@ug.cs.dal.ca (Majeed Goldrick) writes: > Hi everyone, > > I am doing a bit of work for an office with a bunch of 386SX 16MHz machines. > They are using monochrome monitors (!!!).I would like to get them going on > some Windows applications, but it would seem to me that this would be > extremely slow in the current setup. The question is - how can I optimize > these machines for Windows at a reasonable price. Do I: O.K my 2 cents worth, note, I'm no expert, but thats never stopped me before 8-) > > 1) Buy new vga/svga cards/monitors for them - how much faster would > this make them? VGA cards may make the machines more usable, (colors, people like colors). SVGA is'nt a good idea, it slows the machines down by alot, (it needs to squeeze alot more info across the bus than VGA). As to weather it's cost effective, dunno thats a HCI problem I think > > 2) Add lots of ram (would RAM + a Cache be a good way to go?) RAM yes, deffinately RAM, (this is comming from a man who spent half the night waiting for a 5 min excel tutorial to load on a 2Mb 386SX). I suggest at least 4MB if you plan to run any recent Windows package, e.g W4W 2.0, excel 4.0 etc. With the price of RAM nowadays, I think it's the cheapest way to get more speed. > Co-processors?, do you meant maths or graphics/ windows cp_procs? if you meant the latter I think you're better off getting new motherboards. reason, to specific and expensive, if you mean the former, the windows environment uses only integer maths, so a math coprocessor wont help, (note it will speed up applications which require real number appilcations though. > 3) Invest in coprocessors? > > 4) Try something else (suggestions anyone???), or > > 5) Give up and go home? I really thinks 16MHz SX are still quite usable provided you have a decent sized hard disk and memory, if all you plan to do are things like word processing, I say keep'em. > > Please keep in mind that cost IS a factor. I would appreciate hearing what > your opinions are - if there is sufficient interest (ie. if this question > isn't too trivial) I'll summarize on le net. > > > Later, > > Majeed. > -- Internet: TSUANIAN@cc.curtin.edu.au Bitnet: TSUANIAN%cc.curtin.edu.au@cunyvm.bitnet UUCP : uunet!munnari.oz!cc.curtin.edu.au!TSUANIAN
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug19.152337.1@cc.curtin.edu.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!uniwa!cujo!cc.curtin.edu.au!tsuanianReferences:
<Bsu89r.3K6@cs.dal.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,comp.os.msdos.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!uniwa!cujo!cc.curtin.edu.au!tsuanian From: tsuanian@cc.curtin.edu.au Subject: Re: Optimizing 386SX-16's for Windows Message-ID: <1992Aug19.152337.1@cc.curtin.edu.au> Lines: 56 Sender: news@cujo.curtin.edu.au (News Manager) Organization: Curtin University of Technology References: <Bsu89r.3K6@cs.dal.ca> Distribution: na Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 06:23:37 GMT