Article View: comp.ibm.pc.hardware
Article #2Re: Optimizing 386SX-16's for Windows
From: Holger Spangardt
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 12:18
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 12:18
46 lines
2715 bytes
2715 bytes
goldrick@ug.cs.dal.ca (Majeed Goldrick) writes: >Hi everyone, >I am doing a bit of work for an office with a bunch of 386SX 16MHz machines. >They are using monochrome monitors (!!!).I would like to get them going on >some Windows applications, but it would seem to me that this would be >extremely slow in the current setup. The question is - how can I optimize >these machines for Windows at a reasonable price. Do I: >1) Buy new vga/svga cards/monitors for them - how much faster would > this make them? Though Windows is an graphic-oriented-shell the speed of the graphiccard is not important, a Herculescard might be faster than a vga-card, but a colorscreen makes more fun working with Windows.(of course expensive) >2) Add lots of ram (would RAM + a Cache be a good way to go?) The best way to tune the system with Windows is to buy as much RAM as possible. A Cachecontroller makes the system much faster,too, but this is not very cheap. >3) Invest in coprocessors? A coproc has hardly influence on the speed of Windows. There are only few apps like Winword that use this coproc. >4) Try something else (suggestions anyone???), or First of all, the WIN.INI and the SYSTEM.INI should be optimized. E.g.: You can use the SWAPFILE which makes Windows faster using the tempfiles. Do not load any pictures in the Background and start Windows with "win :" which suppresses the Windowslogo at the beginning. A fast Harddisk is very important,too. It should be a fast SCSI-HD, cause the datatransfer is very important.(SCSI is about 2times faster then IDE) The configuration of the system, like HD-Cache,Buffers,...to speed up DOS. >5) Give up and go home? Of course the best way to make Windows faster is to sell the 386SX (UUGH) and buy 486/50MHz, 256 Cache, 32MB RAM(50ns), 70HzSVGA-Card, 24``Monitor, 1GB SCSI (12ms,1500Kbps),etc >Please keep in mind that cost IS a factor. I would appreciate hearing what >your opinions are - if there is sufficient interest (ie. if this question >isn't too trivial) I'll summarize on le net. "There are no trivial questions" (don`t know who said that) >Later, >Majeed.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug12.121839.12941@uni-paderborn.de>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!Sirius.dfn.de!math.fu-berlin.de!pbinfo2!hospReferences:
<Bsu89r.3K6@cs.dal.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,comp.os.msdos.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!Sirius.dfn.de!math.fu-berlin.de!pbinfo2!hosp From: hosp@uni-paderborn.de (Holger Spangardt) Subject: Re: Optimizing 386SX-16's for Windows Message-ID: <1992Aug12.121839.12941@uni-paderborn.de> Sender: news@uni-paderborn.de (News Uni-Paderborn) Nntp-Posting-Host: ahorn Organization: Uni-GH Paderborn References: <Bsu89r.3K6@cs.dal.ca> Distribution: na Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 12:18:39 GMT Lines: 47