Article View: comp.ibm.pc.hardware
Article #4Re: Optimizing 386SX-16's for Windows
From: John Martin
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 03:53
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 03:53
24 lines
1665 bytes
1665 bytes
In article <Bsu89r.3K6@cs.dal.ca>, goldrick@ug.cs.dal.ca (Majeed Goldrick) writes: >They are using monochrome monitors (!!!).I would like to get them going on >some Windows applications, but it would seem to me that this would be >extremely slow in the current setup. The question is - how can I optimize >these machines for Windows at a reasonable price. Do I: I realize that I am treading on dangerous ground here (I will probably catch it from the Windows zealots), so I am donning my asbestos underwear... Doesn't the fact that you have to optimize the hardware to make a given piece of software run with acceptable speed raise questions in anybody's mind? This immediately raises a warning flag in my brain that perhaps the software in question is not the best answer to the problem! Especially when there are better solutions on the market. Please, I am interested in discussions on this, but send your flames to /dev/null. -- John Martin johnm@cajal.uoregon.edu Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97402
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug13.035324.24260@nntp.uoregon.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!rpi!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.u.washington.edu!nntp.uoregon.edu!cajal.uoregon.edu!johnmReferences:
<Bsu89r.3K6@cs.dal.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,comp.os.msdos.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!rpi!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.u.washington.edu!nntp.uoregon.edu!cajal.uoregon.edu!johnm From: johnm@cajal.uoregon.edu (John Martin) Subject: Re: Optimizing 386SX-16's for Windows Message-ID: <1992Aug13.035324.24260@nntp.uoregon.edu> Keywords: n Sender: news@nntp.uoregon.edu Organization: Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon References: <Bsu89r.3K6@cs.dal.ca> Distribution: na Date: Thu, 13 Aug 92 03:53:24 GMT Lines: 24