🚀 go-pugleaf

>>>>> On 19 Oct 1994, tglaab@nooster.navy.mil (Tom Glaab) wrote:

  tglaab> available to all americans?  does this mean that suddenly all
  tglaab> americans will have access to the internet and the tools required
  tglaab> (such as mosaic)?

  tglaab> why don't they just come out and say "available to that small part
  tglaab> of the population with full internet access"?

Why be so negative?  Here the administration is doing something that can only
be said to be a *good* thing, and some people *still* have to find something
to criticize.  This kind of thing reminds me of a columnist in a local
newspaper who cannot seem to find it in her miserable little conservative
heart to acknowledge anything positive about the present administration.

  tglaab> if you ever wondered why innocent-sounding bills get vetoed, watch
  tglaab> c-span when they're doing live coverage late at night.  all sorts
  tglaab> of strange amendments get made to bills, amendments which have
  tglaab> little to do with the main bill.

And what led to this non sequitur?  (I happen to agree with you about this,
but I don't understand what this has to do with the rest of the message.)
--
   Mike Hucka (michael.hucka@umich.edu)
   University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.