🚀 go-pugleaf

From ifab750@walt.cc.utexas.edu (Matthew S. Cohen):
> As of this moment, we don't know exactly how the proceedings
> will be published.  We do not plan on publishing them in conjunction
> with any ACM SIG but who knows what could pop up between now and then.
> We have had many requests that the proceedings or portions
> thereof be posted to a newsgroup (alt.cyberpunk.tech perhaps or 
> ???.cyberspace if that happens most likely).  Any suggestions on
> this or reasons for going the ACM route as well as submissions/comments/
> suggestions would be appreciated.

    Proceedings are generally much too long to be posted to 
    newsgroups, and I think trying to do this would upset a fair 
    number of system administrators.  Newsgroups are better-suited 
    to the discussion of some of the more interesting articles. 
     
    Since this topic is basically an advanced development of the
    object-oriented paradigm, I would think that the proceedings
    should be published in conjunction with SIGOBJ, an ACM SIG on 
    the object-oriented paradigm which is presently in the works.  
    For now, the object-oriented discussions are taking place under 
    either the SIGPLAN (SIGPLAN => Special Interest Group on Programming
    Languages) banner (e.g., OOPSLA proceedings) or the SIGSOFT
    (Software Engineering) banner; discussions should be held with
    both of these SIGS if SIGOBJ doesn't get created in time.

    
    Bill Wolfe, wtwolfe@hubcap.clemson.edu