🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <16111@brahms.udel.edu>, young@brahms.udel.edu (Phillip Young) writes:
> >I suspect that NTSC/PAL differences are going to be significant for your
> >choice of monitor, overlay card, videodisc, and videodisc player. I'm
> >not really up on this subject--anyone else?
> >
>    The biggest question with NTSC vs. PAL is where you intend to
> distribute your product.  NTSC is the official standard in the U.S.
> while PAL is the standard of choice in Europe and much of the rest of
> the world.  Thus, if you intend to market in the U.S. of A. NTSC is the
> most appropriate choice. 
>   I have heard a rumor that there is a videodisc player on the market
> which will play both formats.  Has anyone heard of such a beast?  (I
> would LIKE to believe this is true.)  There are overlay cards, such as 
> IBM's M-Motion, which will support both NTSC and PAL input.  This kind
> of system helps to reduce system configuration restrictions a bit.


The latest Sony LDP 3600 is reputed to play NTSC and PAL discs.  Similarly,
Sony has for some time made video monitors which will accept PAL, NTSC or SECAM
mode input.

We put out a product, POSSUM (Pictures of Standard Syndromes and Undiagnosed 
Malformations) in PAL and NTSC.  The generic master is on 35mm film, the first
dub master is on one inch PAL video tape.  It is now well within the state of 
the art to transfer images from PAL to NTSC.  The only catch is that if you're
transferring stills, you need frame-by-frame accuracy; if you're transferring
movies you use five NTSC frames to generate six PAL frames.  The NTSC to PAL
conversion and vice versa is routine in the domain of TV.


D