🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <4011@mindlink.UUCP> a544@mindlink.UUCP (Rick McCormack) writes:
>I wonder if we could consider a name for the group that stresses the
>*Inter-Active* rather than the *Multi-Media*?   As this group is called
>*Ivideo*, (I feel the I-part could be expanded to IA as in IAVideo), a logical
>step would be to *Comp.IAmedia*.

I like Kathy Strong's suggestion for comp.interactive, I think (unless there 
is a groundswell of preference for comp.polymedia, of course).  I don't 
know that I want to see too much convergence of the computer-video stuff 
into the interactive media stuff - there is a lot of computer video 
activity that is non-interactive and not multimedia.  

I still have to object strongly to comp.multimedia.  Multimedia is almost 
useless as a descriptive word.  I went to a multimedia art show recently, 
that featured art, for example, of papier-mache, gouache, and acrylic.  I 
have attended multimedia lectures with three slide projectors and a 
tape player.  I have seen a multimedia tutorial that I just sat and watched 
after pressing the Enter key.  

Interactive is the key word here.  (I have no objection to subsuming 
hypertext into the group.)  

-lar

-- 
Lar Kaufman            I would feel more optimistic about a bright future
(voice) 512-329-2455   for man if he spent less time proving that he can
(fax)   512-329-2755   outwit Nature and more time tasting her sweetness 
lark@tivoli.com        and respecting her seniority.  - E.B. White