🚀 go-pugleaf

saddle:

I love DOS based projects, but don't you think that by the time someone
leaves high school and enters a technical institution in a (supposedly) high
tech program (Electronic Engineering Technologist) that they would
understand DOS and WinXXXX ? I sure did, and considering that win 95/98 have
dos environments, why would they be trying to push DOS 6.22 and win 3.11?

        Just a question and all...

                                I Remain,
                                    Death Bringer

saddle wrote in message <7cocdq$3q0$1@winter.news.rcn.net>...
>deathbringer wrote in message <7cn4nq$s4g$1@winter.news.rcn.net>...
>>Last I heard from someone attending DeVry (I don't know personally, It's
>>been years scince I've been there) they are sill teaching win 3.11 and
>>dos6.2 to their first year EET's instead of 95/98 or NT. Just cause they
>are
>>teaching tunney manipulation of FCB's doesnt mean they expect him to have
a
>>use for the information. That is why I think most of the educational
>>institutions out there suck. They teach alot of crap for filler, and very
>>little usefull knowledge. I swear a person can learn 10 times faster using
>>the internet and thier own curiousity then they ever could in an
>educational
>>institution. The teaching methods are all wrong, and there is more focus
on
>>the program than the student.
>
>That's a bit harsh, for our business doing doing embedded assembler work,
>we'd never go near WinXXXX for serious machines that need to work long
term.
>There are lots of people in this area doing DOS based projects.
>
>Regards,
>
>Saddle (In the land of OZ)
>
>
>