Article View: comp.lang.asm370
Article #151Re: GETFST
From: Jim Colten
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1989 14:30
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1989 14:30
20 lines
1219 bytes
1219 bytes
>Jim, > >I did neglect to say that on the mainframe the date/time stamp is >changed by a disconnected vm. Users are not permitted to change their >own files. > That is marginally better. A file has a timestamp and I feel that the one and only valid timestamp is the one that indicates when the data in the file was last changed. Besides, when viewed from a low enough level, the DVM is indeed a user :-) The previous posting on this topic suggested a valid use for correcting the timestamp of a file that had been transfered from another machine without the timestamp being preserved. That seems ok as a cure. Apply the cure and continue to press for prevention (the file xfer software could preserve the timestamp). cheers, Jim
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8909211637.AA16566@jade.berkeley.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!dptg!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!ucsd!ucbvax!UMINN1.BITNET!IJIMShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!dptg!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!ucsd!ucbvax!UMINN1.BITNET!IJIM From: IJIM@UMINN1.BITNET (Jim Colten) Newsgroups: comp.lang.asm370 Subject: Re: GETFST Message-ID: <8909211637.AA16566@jade.berkeley.edu> Date: 21 Sep 89 14:30:53 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: IBM 370 Assembly Programming Discussion List <ASM370%UCF1VM.bitnet@jade.berkeley.edu> Distribution: inet Organization: The Internet Lines: 20