Re: ICM vs. L and LTR

Article View: comp.lang.asm370

Article #318

#318

From: Alasdair Grant
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 11:25

5 lines
767 bytes

I tested this on a 3084Q once: an empty BCT loop takes 100ns, ICM 15,15,0
takes 100ns, and L 15,0; LTR 15,15 takes 74ns. I didn't try to test any
of the subtle pipelining effects so these figures should be taken with a
pinch of salt.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Aug13.112518.3014@cl.cam.ac.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!cam-cl!cl.cam.ac.uk!ag129

References:

<1992Aug12.163757.759@infonode.ingr.com> <1992Aug12.190610.23598@csrd.uiuc.edu> <1992Aug13.042852.11346@rock.concert.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!cam-cl!cl.cam.ac.uk!ag129
From: ag129@cl.cam.ac.uk (Alasdair Grant)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.asm370
Subject: Re: ICM vs. L and LTR
Message-ID: <1992Aug13.112518.3014@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Date: 13 Aug 92 11:25:18 GMT
References: <1992Aug12.163757.759@infonode.ingr.com> <1992Aug12.190610.23598@csrd.uiuc.edu> <1992Aug13.042852.11346@rock.concert.net>
Sender: news@cl.cam.ac.uk (The news facility)
Reply-To: ag129@cl.cam.ac.uk (Alasdair Grant)
Organization: U of Cambridge Comp Lab, UK
Lines: 5

Reply to Parent Message