Re: ICM vs. L and LTR

Article View: comp.lang.asm370

Article #324

#324

From: Alasdair Grant
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 11:25

4 lines
674 bytes

I tested this on a 3084Q once: an empty BCT loop takes 100ns, ICM 15,15,0
takes 100ns, and L 15,0; LTR 15,15 takes 74ns. I didn't try to test any
of the subtle pipelining effects so these figures should be taken with a
pinch of salt.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9208140845.AA21444@nettlerash.berkeley.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!ucbvax!cl.cam.ac.UK!ag129

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!ucbvax!cl.cam.ac.UK!ag129
From: ag129@cl.cam.ac.UK (Alasdair Grant)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.asm370
Subject: Re: ICM vs. L and LTR
Message-ID: <9208140845.AA21444@nettlerash.berkeley.edu>
Date: 13 Aug 92 11:25:18 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: IBM 370 Assembly Programming Discussion List <ASM370%UGA.BITNET@cmsa.Berkeley.EDU>
Distribution: inet
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 4