NUCLEUS

Article View: comp.lang.asm370

Article #78

#78

From: Henry Young 312-413-3626
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 1989 20:53

9 lines
916 bytes

Sorry, I discovered the source of the problem.  When issuing an SVC 202
with a address specified for error handling i.e. DC AL4(CMDERR)
the address does not get changed to reflect the new location in the
nucleus since there is no way to include the base register for addressing.
I guess I will just have to check R15 directly.  After all the 'PER'ing
today, I might as well become a cat. ;)

Thanks.
        - Henry -

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8907112107.AA23647@jade.berkeley.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!iuvax!cica!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!UICVM.BITNET!U23379

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!iuvax!cica!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!UICVM.BITNET!U23379
From: U23379@UICVM.BITNET (Henry Young 312-413-3626)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.asm370
Subject: NUCLEUS
Message-ID: <8907112107.AA23647@jade.berkeley.edu>
Date: 11 Jul 89 20:53:53 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: IBM 370 Assembly Programming Discussion List <ASM370%UCF1VM.bitnet@jade.berkeley.edu>
Distribution: inet
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 9