Thread View: comp.lang.basic.misc
2 messages
2 total messages
Started by mail12706
Thu, 13 Feb 1997 00:00
which BASIC is best for PIC chip?
Author: mail12706
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1997 00:00
19 lines
2078 bytes
2078 bytes
I have seen so many compilers advertised for doing BASIC on the PIC chip, (PIC16C57, PIC16C84, etc). Which one is the most versatile. I have (built) the PIC16C84 Programmer developed by Jens Madsen at http://www.ebar.dtu.dk/~c888600/newpic.htm which provides a Vpp self-source from the RS-232 directly instead of the external source. This programmer is so simple and well designed that anyone could order the parts and construct it without sapping alot of her time. I just thought BASIC would be the simplest and easiest language for this chip, but as you know, We just can't pick any BASIC compiler, we all need one that does the trick! The current ones I know about: FED Basic Compiler PicoSaurus (I think it is the same as FED?) PicBasic Compiler from MicroEngineering Labs MEL Compiler
Re: which BASIC is best for PIC chip?
Author: HB - K�benhavn K
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1997 00:00
13 lines
1673 bytes
1673 bytes
On Thu, 13 Feb 1997 04:10:28 -0500, "mail12706@pop.net" <mail12706@pop.net> wrote: >I have seen so many compilers advertised for doing BASIC on the PIC >chip, (PIC16C57, PIC16C84, etc). Which one is the most versatile. > >I have (built) the PIC16C84 Programmer developed by Jens Madsen at Hva'�h. Er det noget du vil s�lge, eller er din news-reader bare som default sat til at sende til alle ng's?? /Henning
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads