Thread View: comp.lang.basic.visual.database
5 messages
5 total messages
Started by Gary Long
Tue, 14 May 1996 00:00
Re: Vis Basic to MVS DB2
Author: Gary Long
Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 00:00
Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 00:00
44 lines
2648 bytes
2648 bytes
>From: d4dmitc@sr.pacbell.com (Dave Mitchell) >Subject: Vis Basic to MVS DB2 >Date: Tue, 07 May 1996 20:41:34 GMT > >We are converting our existing COBOL/DB2/CICS apps to a Visual Basic >front-end (running on Win/NT or Win 3.11) but the data will remain in >DB2 on MVS. Has anyone had experience with doing this - what will I >need to get thru. I have had suggestions of using a WIN NT server >with SNA Server and either STARSQL or Wall Data's RUMBA and I have >heard to use IBM's DDCS. Any other suggestions? We are very new at >this and right at the beginning, so any suggestions, comments would be >appreciated. > >Thanks, > >Dave Dave, it depends a lot on the type of application you are creating. If it is retrieval-intensive -- DSS or whatever -- then a DBMS gateway such as DDCS is the right choice. If it is transaction-oriented, then I highly recommend IBM's CICS External Client Interface (ECI). For transacations, ECI is easy and clean. Works like a charm. Your PC can send a message directly to a CICS/ESA COBOL program via SNA. (ECI also works with to CICS/AIX.) The CICS COBOL program gets the message in the COMMAREA and replies the same way. You can access data of any kind, and also reuse legacy code. Only problem with the ECI is that it is C-oriented making it a little hard to use from PB or VB. For our Application Generator we wrote a DLL to make it easy (not a real big deal). -- Gary ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Long glong@magna.com Vice President, Product Development Magna Software Corporation Phone: 703/222-3500 12450 Fair Lakes Circle Fax: 703/222-8433 Fairfax, Virginia 22033 Technical data on "MAGNA X" CS/TP Application Generator: info@magna.com
Re: Vis Basic to MVS DB2
Author: Lenny
Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 00:00
Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 00:00
45 lines
2746 bytes
2746 bytes
Gary Long <garyl@magna.com> wrote: >>From: d4dmitc@sr.pacbell.com (Dave Mitchell) >>Subject: Vis Basic to MVS DB2 >>Date: Tue, 07 May 1996 20:41:34 GMT >> >>We are converting our existing COBOL/DB2/CICS apps to a Visual Basic >>front-end (running on Win/NT or Win 3.11) but the data will remain in >>DB2 on MVS. Has anyone had experience with doing this - what will I >>need to get thru. I have had suggestions of using a WIN NT server >>with SNA Server and either STARSQL or Wall Data's RUMBA and I have >>heard to use IBM's DDCS. Any other suggestions? We are very new at >>this and right at the beginning, so any suggestions, comments would be >>appreciated. >> >>Thanks, >> >>Dave > >Dave, it depends a lot on the type of application you are creating. If it is >retrieval-intensive -- DSS or whatever -- then a DBMS gateway such as DDCS is >the right choice. If it is transaction-oriented, then I highly recommend >IBM's CICS External Client Interface (ECI). > >For transacations, ECI is easy and clean. Works like a charm. > >Your PC can send a message directly to a CICS/ESA COBOL program via SNA. >(ECI also works with to CICS/AIX.) The CICS COBOL program gets the message >in the COMMAREA and replies the same way. You can access data of any kind, >and also reuse legacy code. > >Only problem with the ECI is that it is C-oriented making it a little hard >to use from PB or VB. For our Application Generator we wrote a DLL to make >it easy (not a real big deal). > >-- Gary > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Gary Long glong@magna.com >Vice President, Product Development >Magna Software Corporation Phone: 703/222-3500 >12450 Fair Lakes Circle Fax: 703/222-8433 >Fairfax, Virginia 22033 > >Technical data on "MAGNA X" CS/TP Application Generator: info@magna.com
Re: Vis Basic to MVS DB2
Author: Michael Prowell
Date: Sat, 18 May 1996 00:00
Date: Sat, 18 May 1996 00:00
51 lines
2246 bytes
2246 bytes
Gary Long <garyl@magna.com> wrote: =>>From: d4dmitc@sr.pacbell.com (Dave Mitchell) =>>Subject: Vis Basic to MVS DB2 =>>Date: Tue, 07 May 1996 20:41:34 GMT =>> =>>We are converting our existing COBOL/DB2/CICS apps to a Visual Basic =>>front-end (running on Win/NT or Win 3.11) but the data will remain in =>>DB2 on MVS. Has anyone had experience with doing this - what will [snip] =>>Thanks, =>> =>>Dave =>Dave, it depends a lot on the type of application you are creating. If it is =>retrieval-intensive -- DSS or whatever -- then a DBMS gateway such as DDCS is =>the right choice. If it is transaction-oriented, then I highly recommend =>IBM's CICS External Client Interface (ECI). =>For transacations, ECI is easy and clean. Works like a charm. =>Your PC can send a message directly to a CICS/ESA COBOL program via SNA. =>(ECI also works with to CICS/AIX.) The CICS COBOL program gets the message =>in the COMMAREA and replies the same way. You can access data of any kind, =>and also reuse legacy code. =>Only problem with the ECI is that it is C-oriented making it a little hard =>to use from PB or VB. For our Application Generator we wrote a DLL to make =>it easy (not a real big deal). =>-- Gary We are currently using DDCS. As you said, retrieval works well and is fairly quick. Updating, on the other hand, with any volume, stinks. We are in the process of creating stored procedures on the mainframe to handle all updates. Plan is to batch all updates and let the stored procedure parse and apply. Anyone have any real life experience with this type of approach?
Re: Vis Basic to MVS DB2
Author: Gene Kligerman
Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 00:00
Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 00:00
25 lines
1682 bytes
1682 bytes
Michael Prowell wrote: > > We are currently using DDCS. As you said, retrieval works well and is > fairly quick. Updating, on the other hand, with any volume, stinks. > > We are in the process of creating stored procedures on the mainframe > to handle all updates. Plan is to batch all updates and let the > stored procedure parse and apply. > > Anyone have any real life experience with this type of approach? Have you considered using the "Compound SQL" feature supported by DDCS? It allows you to batch a number of insert/update/delete/... SQL statements in a single DRDA request that flows over the wire. -- Gene Kligerman DB2 Development, IBM Software Solutions Toronto Lab genie@vnet.ibm.com Got a question? The DB2 Product and Service Technical Library might have an answer. Search http://www.software.ibm.com/data/db2/support/servinfo
Re: Vis Basic to MVS DB2
Author: Vadim Rapp
Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 00:00
Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 00:00
28 lines
2169 bytes
2169 bytes
Gary Long <garyl@magna.com> wrote: >> >>We are converting our existing COBOL/DB2/CICS apps to a Visual Basic >>front-end (running on Win/NT or Win 3.11) but the data will remain in >>DB2 on MVS. > >Dave, it depends a lot on the type of application you are creating. If it is >retrieval-intensive -- DSS or whatever -- then a DBMS gateway such as DDCS is >the right choice. If it is transaction-oriented, then I highly recommend >IBM's CICS External Client Interface (ECI). >For transacations, ECI is easy and clean. Works like a charm. >Only problem with the ECI is that it is C-oriented making it a little hard >to use from PB or VB. For our Application Generator we wrote a DLL to make >it easy (not a real big deal). I wouldn't recommend from the very beginning to create smth aside of standards, write proprietary DLL which in the future definitely face some incompatibility problems with newer releases and thus restrict some newer features. There's ODBC standard, there's DRDA standard, why not use? Why become dependable of CICS logic? The advantage of ODBC-oriented approach is that your environment stays open, and it's not a problem in the future to add some new ODBC-compliant data source. There are lots of ODBC-compliant tools, I am not that sure about CICS-compliant ones. 6 months ago I've commited the project written just in VB with remote DB2. The main manual I used was ODBC reference, not even DB2 one! Vadim
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads