🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.lang.basic.visual.misc
Article #101

Re: "SHOULD I DUMP VISUAL BASIC?"

#101
From: MurphyCVS
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 1996 09:18
17 lines
1216 bytes
hraiser@cloud9.net wrote:

 No compiler can compensate for a weak, cumbersome, limited language like
(Viusal) Basic.  Delphi has an excellent environment, but nothing on
heaven
or Earth can make me go back to coding Pascal.  Smart money is on Latte,
Borland's upcoming Java based programming environment, based on the Delphi
front end.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------

I just started learning Delphi (easier going than I thought it would be)
after using ObjectPal in PDOXWIN for some time, and NOW, you say Borland
is coming out with another type of Language soon...  How do developers
keep up with the learning curves?

Mike
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4fkc8c$1gr@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
References: <4et3p7$79o@cloud9.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: murphycvs@aol.com (MurphyCVS)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.basic.visual.misc,comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: "SHOULD I DUMP VISUAL BASIC?"
Date: 11 Feb 1996 04:18:04 -0500
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com
Message-ID: <4fkc8c$1gr@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
References: <4et3p7$79o@cloud9.net>
Reply-To: murphycvs@aol.com (MurphyCVS)
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com