Article View: comp.lang.basic.visual.misc
Article #101Re: "SHOULD I DUMP VISUAL BASIC?"
From: MurphyCVS
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 1996 09:18
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 1996 09:18
17 lines
1216 bytes
1216 bytes
hraiser@cloud9.net wrote: No compiler can compensate for a weak, cumbersome, limited language like (Viusal) Basic. Delphi has an excellent environment, but nothing on heaven or Earth can make me go back to coding Pascal. Smart money is on Latte, Borland's upcoming Java based programming environment, based on the Delphi front end. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------- I just started learning Delphi (easier going than I thought it would be) after using ObjectPal in PDOXWIN for some time, and NOW, you say Borland is coming out with another type of Language soon... How do developers keep up with the learning curves? Mike
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4fkc8c$1gr@newsbf02.news.aol.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<4et3p7$79o@cloud9.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: murphycvs@aol.com (MurphyCVS) Newsgroups: comp.lang.basic.visual.misc,comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc,comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: "SHOULD I DUMP VISUAL BASIC?" Date: 11 Feb 1996 04:18:04 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4fkc8c$1gr@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4et3p7$79o@cloud9.net> Reply-To: murphycvs@aol.com (MurphyCVS) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com