🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.lang.basic.visual.misc
Article #151

Re: "SHOULD I DUMP VISUAL BASIC?"

#151
From: Jens Balchen Jr.
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 22:55
17 lines
1306 bytes
pbe@pobox.com decided to share with us the infinite reservoirs of wisdom:

>     They infact did. A contractor "used a new tool". When MS became aware,
>they rewrote it.  I have confirmation from the VB team on this one.

Mmmm! The point was that the statement

"It seems that even MS use Delphi more than VB"

based on the fact that MS has used Delphi for ONE app, is ridiculous.

Jens (balchen@sn.no)
-- 
Newbiehood is not a period of time, it's a way of life.

http://www.sn.no/~balchen
ftp://ftp.sn.no/user/balchen/
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4gg7mo$b4t@hasle.sn.no>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sn.no!usenet
References: <4e9g08$3dp@maureen.teleport.com> <4e9oji$me5@news-2.csn.net> <4ebko9$8tn@hasle.sn.no> <4egdqm$app@shore.shore.net> <4eiogb$cas@hasle.sn.no> <310CFB3E.114B@mail.inett.no> <4etkm5$n3p@newshost.cyberramp.net> <4f63bc$97a@news.service.uci.edu> <0a5Gx0JfFSfU089yn@oslonett.no> <4fj6c2$n8f@hasle.sn.no> <4fjti3$8po@texas.nwlink.com> <4gd8rc$gdg@news.tricon.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sn.no!usenet
From: balchen@sn.no (Jens Balchen Jr.)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.basic.visual.misc,comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: "SHOULD I DUMP VISUAL BASIC?"
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 22:55:42 GMT
Organization: Innocent Software
Message-ID: <4gg7mo$b4t@hasle.sn.no>
References: <4e9g08$3dp@maureen.teleport.com> <4e9oji$me5@news-2.csn.net> <4ebko9$8tn@hasle.sn.no> <4egdqm$app@shore.shore.net> <4eiogb$cas@hasle.sn.no> <310CFB3E.114B@mail.inett.no> <4etkm5$n3p@newshost.cyberramp.net> <4f63bc$97a@news.service.uci.edu> <0a5Gx0JfFSfU089yn@oslonett.no> <4fj6c2$n8f@hasle.sn.no> <4fjti3$8po@texas.nwlink.com> <4gd8rc$gdg@news.tricon.net>
Reply-To: balchen@sn.no
NNTP-Posting-Host: krs3-6.ppp.sn.no
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82