Article View: comp.lang.basic.visual.misc
Article #163Re: "SHOULD I DUMP VISUAL BASIC?"
From: Scott
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 23:27
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 23:27
46 lines
3369 bytes
3369 bytes
In article <4fbkh0$8au@news4.digex.net>, ell@access1.digex.net says... > >I find Visual Basic to be a nice complement to my C++ tools, as I'm sure >Delphi and similar are. Admittedly Delphi can "put the pedal to the >metal" somewhat more than VB. > >Elliott I agree with Elliott, Microsoft has really place Visual Basic as a wonderfull interface developement language with great qualities of mixed language developement features. VB can integrate with C++ through DLLs, OLE, and OLE custom controls. (leak/rumor) That version 5 will support true compiling to machine code not pcode. Remember that software developement is big task which includes the pain stacking customization of the interface ... C++ does not allow for easy and fast customizing of interfaces that enviroments like Delpi and VB support. A misunderstood fact about pcode in VB is that it must be so slow because each instruction must be interpretted. One statement in VB may be the equivalent of 100 statements in C++ ... the overhead of interpreting the one statement per 100 c++ instructions is pretty minimal for the flexibility and simplicity gained by the language. A VB program is as good as the programmer ... unload processing onto APIs and controls that are written in C/C++/ASM. We are putting the finishing touches on a training package that currently has full screen full motion video. The video contains actors that can be touched using a touch screen or a mouse - these movie real life actors are tracked dynamically to determine who got touched. The program simulates a party at the ambassadors party in paris where you can interact with people in real time. The entire program is based in Visual Basic attached to an Access 2.0 database using a handful of VBX controls. you would never think that Visual Basic was used to develope the package ... and the time saving was unreal compared to full developement in C++. The software is called Tuning In! developed by Motivational Concepts, Inc. used in Tuning In! training sponsored by Chamber of Commerces across the nation. This is not comparison to go to VB over C++, but never underestimate the power of a software package...Use the right tool for the right job. Which in many cases is several packages for mixed language developement. N. Scott Vann Motivational Concepts, Inc. Software Engineering/Multimedia Training Systems Good luck to everyone...
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4ftr5f$jg7@dot.cstone.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.cstone.net!usenetReferences:
<4e9g08$3dp@maureen.teleport.com> <4e9oji$me5@news-2.csn.net> <4ebko9$8tn@hasle.sn.no> <4egdqm$app@shore.shore.net> <4eiogb$cas@hasle.sn.no> <310CFB3E.114B@mail.inett.no> <4etkm5$n3p@newshost.cyberramp.net> <4etn2k$ho4@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <4f3hi7$390e@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <4f6mi5$qts@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <Pine.SOL.3.91.960206154930.13139C-100000@shiva.hunter.cuny.edu> <4fajo6$4b1@hasle.sn.no> <4fbkh0$8au@news4.digex.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.cstone.net!usenet From: scottv@cstone.net (Scott) Newsgroups: comp.lang.basic.visual.misc,comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc,comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: "SHOULD I DUMP VISUAL BASIC?" Date: 14 Feb 1996 23:27:43 GMT Organization: Cornerstone Networks - Pure Internet! Message-ID: <4ftr5f$jg7@dot.cstone.net> References: <4e9g08$3dp@maureen.teleport.com> <4e9oji$me5@news-2.csn.net> <4ebko9$8tn@hasle.sn.no> <4egdqm$app@shore.shore.net> <4eiogb$cas@hasle.sn.no> <310CFB3E.114B@mail.inett.no> <4etkm5$n3p@newshost.cyberramp.net> <4etn2k$ho4@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <4f3hi7$390e@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <4f6mi5$qts@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <Pine.SOL.3.91.960206154930.13139C-100000@shiva.hunter.cuny.edu> <4fajo6$4b1@hasle.sn.no> <4fbkh0$8au@news4.digex.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: dialin14.cstone.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.7