Re: "SHOULD I DUMP VISUAL BASIC?"

Article View: comp.lang.basic.visual.misc

Article #169

Back to comp.lang.basic.visual.misc Previous Next

#169

From: David Nottage
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 03:04

6 lines
1015 bytes

>OTOH, their DOS Basic compilers were fantastic.

_What_ DOS Basic compilers??????. If they had any, why did they give the 
idea up??

Dave

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4g8pc0$55s@cdn_news.telecom.com.au>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!cdn_news.telecom.com.au!usenet

References:

<4e9g08$3dp@maureen.teleport.com> <Pine.SUN.3.90.960126125658.2477C-100000@menger.eecs.stevens-tech.edu> <sundial.2191.00464727@primenet.com> <DLvxyq.62w@news.hawaii.edu> <4et3p7$79o@cloud9.net> <823335327.28831@williaj.demon.co.uk> <4f8akg$i3k@druid.borland.com> <W1eMJBAdliGxEwNI@pwhite.demon.co.uk> <31224bc4.6786639@news.netonecom.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!cdn_news.telecom.com.au!usenet
From: David Nottage <DNottage@SCOMHBR3.telecom.com.au>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.basic.visual.misc,comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: "SHOULD I DUMP VISUAL BASIC?"
Date: 19 Feb 1996 03:04:32 GMT
Organization: Telstra
Message-ID: <4g8pc0$55s@cdn_news.telecom.com.au>
References: <4e9g08$3dp@maureen.teleport.com> <Pine.SUN.3.90.960126125658.2477C-100000@menger.eecs.stevens-tech.edu> <sundial.2191.00464727@primenet.com> <DLvxyq.62w@news.hawaii.edu> <4et3p7$79o@cloud9.net> <823335327.28831@williaj.demon.co.uk> <4f8akg$i3k@druid.borland.com> <W1eMJBAdliGxEwNI@pwhite.demon.co.uk> <31224bc4.6786639@news.netonecom.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: thab76.scon.telecom.com.au
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)

Reply to Parent Message