Re: "SHOULD I DUMP VISUAL BASIC?"

Article View: comp.lang.basic.visual.misc

Article #43

Back to comp.lang.basic.visual.misc Previous Next

#43

From: Christopher Fynn
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 1996 08:28

16 lines
1154 bytes

In article <ZKkCx0JfF6xG089yn@oslonett.no>
           mobergru@oslonett.no "Rune Moberg" writes:
...
> VB is BASIC with a few added keywords and the possibility to use VBXs and
> DLLs. Performancewise it's still the BASIC we've all learned to love/hate.
> (insert rumours of the old QuickBasic being a true compiler here)
...

I don't know about Quick Basic - but Microsoft's Professional Basic
wasn't bad - if they could make a VB compiler up to that kind of
standard they might have something. 

- Chris

-- 
Christopher J Fynn <cfynn@sahaja.demon.co.uk>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <822817694snz@sahaja.demon.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!mail2news.demon.co.uk!sahaja.demon.co.uk

References: <4e9g08$3dp@maureen.teleport.com> <4e9oji$me5@news-2.csn.net> <ZKkCx0JfF6xG089yn@oslonett.no>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!mail2news.demon.co.uk!sahaja.demon.co.uk
From: Christopher Fynn <cfynn@sahaja.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.basic.visual.misc,comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: "SHOULD I DUMP VISUAL BASIC?"
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 96 08:28:14 GMT
Message-ID: <822817694snz@sahaja.demon.co.uk>
References: <4e9g08$3dp@maureen.teleport.com> <4e9oji$me5@news-2.csn.net> <ZKkCx0JfF6xG089yn@oslonett.no>
Reply-To: cfynn@sahaja.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: sahaja.demon.co.uk
X-Newsreader: Demon Internet Simple News v1.29
X-Mail2News-Path: sahaja.demon.co.uk

Reply to Parent Message