Article View: comp.lang.basic.visual.misc
Article #93Re: "SHOULD I DUMP VISUAL BASIC?"
From: Gary Ingram
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 1996 08:39
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 1996 08:39
14 lines
1271 bytes
1271 bytes
er, I'm boycotting VB4 and am MAH at u$ for ruining what used to be a good product. However, the changes (I would call them enhancements) you describe are good ones if: they are documented so other language developers can use them and, they reflect a commitment to the break through VB represented back in 1992. However, IMHO, the C (++ if you prefer) at usoft are ruining VB because they can't stand the heat. If gates had the vision he thinks he has he would not let it happen. Gary
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4f9of7$sb6@news.tdl.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.tdl.com!newsReferences:
<4e9g08$3dp@maureen.teleport.com> <4e9oji$me5@news-2.csn.net> <4ebko9$8tn@hasle.sn.no> <4egdqm$app@shore.shore.net> <4eiogb$cas@hasle.sn.no> <310CFB3E.114B@mail.inett.no> <4etkm5$n3p@newshost.cyberramp.net> <4f63bc$97a@news.service.uci.edu> <4f92nd$1e3i@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.tdl.com!news From: Gary Ingram <garyi@dtbsware.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.basic.visual.misc,comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc,comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: "SHOULD I DUMP VISUAL BASIC?" Date: 7 Feb 1996 08:39:03 GMT Organization: dTb Software Message-ID: <4f9of7$sb6@news.tdl.com> References: <4e9g08$3dp@maureen.teleport.com> <4e9oji$me5@news-2.csn.net> <4ebko9$8tn@hasle.sn.no> <4egdqm$app@shore.shore.net> <4eiogb$cas@hasle.sn.no> <310CFB3E.114B@mail.inett.no> <4etkm5$n3p@newshost.cyberramp.net> <4f63bc$97a@news.service.uci.edu> <4f92nd$1e3i@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: tdl-dyn44.tdl.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)