Article View: comp.lang.basic.visual
Article #27Re: Language "ranking" based on posts to users groups
From: Glen C. Perkins
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 23:05
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 23:05
44 lines
2983 bytes
2983 bytes
Dan, the original poster, was kind enough to drop me a note explaining the source of the numbers. It appears as though the numbers are being misinterpreted by most of us. The numbers used were simply the message numbers of the most recent message posted in each group. I have no idea whether those message numbers are really an accurate count of all messages ever posted to a group, but if they are, then that's what was being ranked: the total number of messages ever posted to a particular group (with some groups being combined, as he said.) This, then, is far more a measure of the age of the groups than it is a measure of their *current* popularity. Of course, popularity is the Y axis of the curve whose "area under the curve" was being measured but in this case, since the X range varies so dramatically from group to group, it's difficult to draw almost any conclusion. It seems to me that the "total number of postings last month" for each group would be a bit more interesting, and might not be too hard for some enterprising young programmer looking for a quick project to manage. (Dan, by the way, has no interest in going any farther with it. He didn't intend it to be any big deal to begin with.) While it's true that the nature and mix of postings will vary a great deal from group to group, there is still a sense in which number of postings per unit time acts as a *rough* proxy for interest level. No matter what the content of the message, in general, the fact that you will take the time to write something at all (rather than just doing something else) means you have some interest in the subject. Because of this, I think it would be interesting to see the current monthly tallies. The monthly tallies graphed over a long time period would make a very interesting web page, if someone feels like doing it. It would be fun to see the leap of interest in Pascal that came with Delphi, the jump in Perl brought by the web, the recent Java wave, the steadiness of Cobol, etc. __Glen Perkins__ -- +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<gperkinsDJwqtH.JBI@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!netcom.com!gperkinsReferences:
<4at4t0$j5j@garden.csc.calpoly.edu> <4b0vt6$24k@warp.ipacific.net.au> <4b32ii$3c@raffles.technet.sg> <4b9ugn$ksg@bert.traverse.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.lang.basic.visual,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.pascal,comp.lang.tcl,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.perl,comp.lang.asm.x86,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.postscript,comp.lang.java,comp.lang.clipper,comp.lang.forth,comp.lang.cobol,comp.lang.rexx,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.python,comp.lang.lisp,comp.lang.scheme Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!netcom.com!gperkins From: gperkins@netcom.com (Glen C. Perkins) Subject: Re: Language "ranking" based on posts to users groups Message-ID: <gperkinsDJwqtH.JBI@netcom.com> Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) References: <4at4t0$j5j@garden.csc.calpoly.edu> <4b0vt6$24k@warp.ipacific.net.au> <4b32ii$3c@raffles.technet.sg> <4b9ugn$ksg@bert.traverse.com> Distribution: inet Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 23:05:41 GMT Sender: gperkins@netcom.netcom.com