🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <4at4t0$j5j@garden.csc.calpoly.edu>, dstubbs@garden.csc.calpoly.edu (Dan Stubbs) says:
<snip>

These numbers don't necessarily represent 'popularity' of a
given language.  It could be that some languages are more
problematic than others, and therefore require more discussion
to resolve these problems.  Also, many posts are nor in fact
related in any way to the language discussed in these groups.

It would be very interesting to see a break down of the type of
post within each language, but I understand this would be a
*great* deal of work.

This information is interesting, as are most stats, but the information
should be taken with a grain of salt.  Thanks for posting it.

	Jim Neil