Re: Random access to ditionaries.

Article View: comp.lang.c++.leda

Article #142

Back to comp.lang.c++.leda Previous Next

#142

From: Alex Beascoechea
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1995 20:58

7 lines
807 bytes

Alex Beascoechea <alex@cat.rpi.edu> wrote:

>In particular I do not see why this could not be part of the sortseq interface,
>and the access can probably be O(nlogn) , maybe adding some field to the
>implementation?
>
Of course I meant O(log n) :-)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <463ppv$3ag@usenet.rpi.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!library.erc.clarkson.edu!rpi!usenet

References: <463n59$17j@usenet.rpi.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!library.erc.clarkson.edu!rpi!usenet
From: Alex Beascoechea <alex@cat.rpi.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++.leda
Subject: Re: Random access to ditionaries.
Date: 18 Oct 1995 20:58:39 GMT
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Message-ID: <463ppv$3ag@usenet.rpi.edu>
References: <463n59$17j@usenet.rpi.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: corning.cat.rpi.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.12 (X11; I; SunOS 5.3 sun4m)
X-URL: news:463n59$17j@usenet.rpi.edu

Reply to Parent Message