Re: Behaviour of mem functions when n=0 ?

Article View: comp.lang.c.moderated

Article #2217

Back to comp.lang.c.moderated Previous Next

#2217

From: Larry Jones
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 1996 23:09

18 lines
1413 bytes

In article <4hlaju$4g0@solutions.solon.com>, fred@genesis.demon.co.uk (Lawrence Kirby) writes:
> In article <4hgc3d$97a@solutions.solon.com>
>            larry.jones@sdrc.com "Larry Jones" writes:
>  > The intent of the standard has been clarified by a Technical Corrigendum
> 
> That does pretty much clear it up. However the wording for the individual
> functions is still nonsensical and it would have been better if that had
> been fixed.

Perhaps, but some of us are fans of zero size objects and intend to get
them added to the next revision of the standard.  We'd hate to change
the words and then just change them back again later. :-)
----
Larry Jones, SDRC, 2000 Eastman Dr., Milford, OH  45150-2789  513-576-2070
larry.jones@sdrc.com
I always send Grandma a thank-you note right away.  ...Ever since she
sent me that empty box with the sarcastic note saying she was just
checking to see if the Postal Service was still working. -- Calvin

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4hqeo0$1r4@solutions.solon.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!solon.com!not-for-mail

References: <4hlaju$4g0@solutions.solon.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!solon.com!not-for-mail
From: larry.jones@sdrc.com (Larry Jones)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c.moderated,comp.std.c
Subject: Re: Behaviour of mem functions when n=0 ?
Date: 8 Mar 1996 17:09:52 -0600
Organization: SDRC Engineering Services
Sender: clc@solutions.solon.com
Approved: clc@solutions.solon.com
Message-ID: <4hqeo0$1r4@solutions.solon.com>
References: <4hlaju$4g0@solutions.solon.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: solutions.solon.com

Reply to Parent Message