Article View: comp.lang.c.moderated
Article #2339Re: C++ -> C
From: Patrick Horgan
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 04:28
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 04:28
22 lines
1384 bytes
1384 bytes
In article <4ii35g$nno@solutions.solon.com>, billy@cast.msstate.edu (Billy Chambless) writes:
--- stuff cut about someone who knows C++ but not C ---
>
>I doubt that you're an idiot, but IMHO, your professors did you a
>disservice.
>
>C++ is not a replacement for C, either from a technical viewpoint OR
>in terms of employability. But many schools either act as if it is, or
>worse, fail to differentiate between the two.
I went through a recent round of job interviews in Silicon Valley, and if I hadn't
been a good C++ programmer I wouldn't have gotten a job. I have friends that want
to change jobs but aren't able to because they don't know C++.
I'm not saying C is dead, but it's going. Here in the valley all the startups
seem to be doing C++.
--
Patrick J. Horgan patrick@broadvision.com Have horse will ride.
Opinions mine, not my employer's except by most bizarre coincidence.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4io1i5$nne@solutions.solon.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!solon.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<4ii35g$nno@solutions.solon.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!solon.com!not-for-mail From: patrick@broadvision.com (Patrick Horgan) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c.moderated Subject: Re: C++ -> C Date: 19 Mar 1996 22:28:53 -0600 Organization: The quite unorganized Patrick Sender: clc@solutions.solon.com Approved: clc@solutions.solon.com Message-ID: <4io1i5$nne@solutions.solon.com> References: <4ii35g$nno@solutions.solon.com> Reply-To: patrick@broadvision.com NNTP-Posting-Host: solutions.solon.com