Re: void* type

Article View: comp.lang.c.moderated

Article #2463

Back to comp.lang.c.moderated Previous Next

#2463

From: news
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 1996 02:07

14 lines
924 bytes

In article <4jmcnh$lqk@solutions.solon.com> Claus Hirth <hirth@wand.franken.de> writes:
 >
 >What still nags at me about the portability issue : 
 >Is there a machine still in use (Kurt, please name it)
 >on which the representation of a 
 >	double * 
 >differs from the representation of a 
 >	char * 
 >?
Honeywell Level/6 (Now Bull DPS-6000).  They are gradually being
replaced, but there are still lots of them out there.

-----------
atbowler@thinkage.on.ca

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4jq24r$aah@solutions.solon.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!solon.com!not-for-mail

References: <4ii34g$nlp@solutions.solon.com> <4jibl5$89u@solutions.solon.com> <4jmcnh$lqk@solutions.solon.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!solon.com!not-for-mail
From: news@Thinkage.On.CA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c.moderated
Subject: Re: void* type
Date: 1 Apr 1996 20:07:23 -0600
Organization: Thinkage Ltd.
Sender: clc@solutions.solon.com
Approved: clc@solutions.solon.com
Message-ID: <4jq24r$aah@solutions.solon.com>
References: <4ii34g$nlp@solutions.solon.com> <4jibl5$89u@solutions.solon.com> <4jmcnh$lqk@solutions.solon.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: solutions.solon.com

Reply to Parent Message