Article View: comp.lang.c.moderated
Article #2568Re: Common way to obfuscate?
From: Tim Hollebeek
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 01:59
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 01:59
15 lines
1185 bytes
1185 bytes
Marcel van Kervinck (buex95a@urc.tue.nl) wrote: : I just recovered from a slight shock caused by realizing that : one could legally rewrite 'a[b[c]]' as 'c[b][a]' Right, since they are both *(a + *(b + c)). Cute. : Is this a common way to obfuscate code? Wouldn't know. I strive to write clear code :-) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Hollebeek | Disclaimer :=> Everything above is a true statement, Electron Psychologist | for sufficiently false values of true. Princeton University | email: tim@wfn-shop.princeton.edu ----------------------| http://wfn-shop.princeton.edu/~tim (NEW! IMPROVED!)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4khp20$pt@solutions.solon.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!solon.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<4khlas$t2g@solutions.solon.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!solon.com!not-for-mail From: tim@franck.Princeton.EDU (Tim Hollebeek) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c.moderated Subject: Re: Common way to obfuscate? Date: 10 Apr 1996 20:59:28 -0500 Organization: Princeton University Sender: clc@solutions.solon.com Approved: clc@solutions.solon.com Message-ID: <4khp20$pt@solutions.solon.com> References: <4khlas$t2g@solutions.solon.com> Reply-To: tim@wagner.Princeton.EDU NNTP-Posting-Host: solutions.solon.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]