🚀 go-pugleaf

schwab@lamothe.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (Andreas Schwab) writes:
|> kgold@watson.ibm.com (K Goldman) writes:
|> 
|> |> My compiler seems to check function prototypes if they exist, but
|> |> is just as happy to not have them.  Therefore . . .
|> 
|> |> Is there an automated way to insure that I have included all the
|> |> header files that I need in my source code?
|> 
|> You don't say which compiler you use, but if you use GCC you can
|> enable -Wmissing-prototypes, -Wstrict-prototypes,
|> -Wmissing-declarations, and/or -Wimplicit, depending on what you want
|> to check for.
|> 

Sorry.  It's xlc, which is the ANSI version of cc, on an IBM RS/6000
running AIX 3.2.5.

I _did_ read the manual, and the man page, and the on-line help,
and there doesn't seem to be a switch to check for prototypes.

-- 
Ken Goldman   kgold@watson.ibm.com   914-784-7396