🚀 go-pugleaf

"Efraim Mostrom" <mostrom.nospam@iname.com> writes:

> Hi!
> 
> Short code for exemple:
> 
> #include <stdio.h>
> int main(int * argc, char * argv[]) {

How come gcc does not complain about the type of argc?  It should be
int.

>     char *buf[1024];

Should be "char buf[1024]", I suppose

> extern int snprintf(char *, int, const char *, ...);

The second argument to snprintf() is of type size_t, not int.

Any self-respectiung lint should complain that argc is not used in
your program.

Does it help if you fix those things?

By the way, just -Wall -pedantic -ansi might not be strict enough
(-Wall is a misnomer). You might want to use 

    -W \
    -pedantic \
    -Wall \
    -Wtraditional \
    -Wshadow \
    -Wid-clash-32 \
    -Wpointer-arith \
    -Wcast-qual \
    -Wcast-align \
    -Wconversion \
    -Wstrict-prototypes \
    -Wmissing-prototypes \
    -Wmissing-declarations \
    -Wnested-externs \

to get more warnings and an approximation to a lint with gcc. 

-- 
Oleg Goldshmidt <ogoldsh@NOSPAM.netvision.net.il> 
"... We work by wit, and not by witchcraft;
 And wit depends on dilatory time." [Shakespeare]
-- 
comp.lang.c.moderated - moderation address: clcm@plethora.net