Article View: comp.lang.clos
Article #105PCL and MACL 2.0, anyother MOP?
From: Thomas_E_Morgan
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 02:10
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 02:10
17 lines
1130 bytes
1130 bytes
I could use some advice. I need more of the MOP than is present in the MACL 2.0 release, and find that the MACL 1.3.2 release doesn't run in my environment. First, how badly will I regret attempting to get PCL working in MACL 2.0? I've made an innocent stab, making some easy changes in some LOW.LISP code and in some DEFSETF's, but have bumped into changes in environment representations that bother the walker code. Am I wandering into a swamp here? Second, if the answer is yes, then what LISP and what machine would you suggest I get myself to run a LISP with a strong MOP - either one that comes with the LISP, or PCL. (Money is not exactly no object here, but I don't want to spend unreasonable amounts either. The less I have to think about the machine, the better.). ...Tom M
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<63920@cup.portal.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!Thomas_E_MorganShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!Thomas_E_Morgan From: Thomas_E_Morgan@cup.portal.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.clos Subject: PCL and MACL 2.0, anyother MOP? Message-ID: <63920@cup.portal.com> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 92 19:10:08 PDT Organization: The Portal System (TM) Distribution: usa Lines: 17