PCL and MACL 2.0, anyother MOP?

Article View: comp.lang.clos

Article #118

#118

From: Thomas_E_Morgan
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 01:07

13 lines
750 bytes

Well, Gregor and Trent's advice give me confidence to
proceed.

I'm using the July PCL as a base, and was happily
making small changes, until I got a failure in some
code walker function, while running compile-pcl.

The code was unhappy about the way in which environments
were represented in the new MCL.

I'll hack away and report back results.

   ...Tom M

Technical Details

Message-ID: <63989@cup.portal.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!news.oc.com!apple!portal!cup.portal.com!Thomas_E_Morgan

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!news.oc.com!apple!portal!cup.portal.com!Thomas_E_Morgan
From: Thomas_E_Morgan@cup.portal.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.clos
Subject: PCL and MACL 2.0, anyother MOP?
Message-ID: <63989@cup.portal.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 92 18:07:03 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Distribution: usa
Lines: 13