Article View: comp.lang.clos
Article #201Re: August 28 PCL
From: Bill Schottstaedt
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 1992 14:07
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 1992 14:07
37 lines
1513 bytes
1513 bytes
(From Rick Taube, hkt@zkm.de) To: rharris@ptolemy2.rdrc.rpi.edu (address bounces) Subject: August 28 PCL I'm trying to figure out why Aug 28 PCL runs so poorly in my environment -- Allegro CL 3.1.20 [NeXT] -- when compared to March 2c. March 2c runs the whole bench-this-clos suite in about the time it takes for Aug28 to do the first benchmark test. While loading the Aug28 PCL, I noticed that some LAP related files are loaded in March 2c but NOT in Aug28 and am hoping that this explains my problem. They appear to have been commented out in August 28 defsys.lisp. In particular, 2c loads the files: Loading binary of FNGEN... Loading binary of LAP... Loading binary of PLAP... Loading binary of CACHE... Loading binary of DLAP... Loading binary of BOOT... but in Aug 28 the files Loading binary of FNGEN... Loading binary of CACHE... Loading binary of DLISP... Loading binary of DLISP2... Loading binary of BOOT... are loaded. Maybe there is some problem with conditionals so that my Aug 28 pcl is running with no optimizations? --- Rick Taube hkt@zkm.de
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep1.140755.6237@leland.Stanford.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!newsReferences:
<ktry+rl@rpi.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.lang.clos Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!news From: bil@cmn16.Stanford.EDU (Bill Schottstaedt) Subject: Re: August 28 PCL Message-ID: <1992Sep1.140755.6237@leland.Stanford.EDU> Sender: news@leland.Stanford.EDU (Mr News) Organization: DSO, Stanford University References: <ktry+rl@rpi.edu> Date: Tue, 1 Sep 92 14:07:55 GMT Lines: 39