Re: New group for discussion of Common Lisp Object System

Article View: comp.lang.clos

Article #237

#237

From: Jeff Dalton
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 1990 19:29

6 lines
803 bytes

In article <7104@rnd.GBA.NYU.EDU> rmadhava@rnd.UUCP (Madhavan AKA Raghav Ragav) writes:

>  Is there a minimum set of functions/functionality that need to be included
>  before a CL becomes a CLOS ?  

A CL does not *become* a CLOS, it includes a CLOS.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3785@skye.ed.ac.uk>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!crdgw1!uunet!mcsun!ukc!edcastle!aiai!jeff

References: <617@roo.UUCP> <7104@rnd.GBA.NYU.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!crdgw1!uunet!mcsun!ukc!edcastle!aiai!jeff
From: jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Jeff Dalton)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.clos
Subject: Re: New group for discussion of Common Lisp Object System
Keywords: CLOS, Common Lisp, object
Message-ID: <3785@skye.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 19 Nov 90 19:29:52 GMT
References: <617@roo.UUCP> <7104@rnd.GBA.NYU.EDU>
Reply-To: jeff@aiai.UUCP (Jeff Dalton)
Organization: AIAI, University of Edinburgh, Scotland
Lines: 6

Reply to Parent Message