Article View: comp.lang.clos
Article #241Re: Is CLOS Object-Oriented ???
From: lawrence.g.mayka
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 1990 01:27
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 1990 01:27
15 lines
1085 bytes
1085 bytes
In article <LANNING.90Nov20110947@archer.parc.xerox.com>, lanning@parc.xerox.com (Stan Lanning) writes: > The argument is (roughly) that functions that are not "owned" by an > object may directly access the internal state of the object, and this > precludes CLOS from being considered an Object-Oriented language. Even Smalltalk has instVar:at:. SLOT-VALUE simply offers the sensible convenience of symbolic slot names rather than numerical structure offsets. Lawrence G. Mayka AT&T Bell Laboratories lgm@iexist.att.com Standard disclaimer.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Nov22.012750.5098@cbnewsc.att.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!xylogics!bu.edu!att!cbfsb!cbnewsc!lgmReferences:
<1990Nov15.101847.26285@diku.dk> <3786@skye.ed.ac.uk> <LANNING.90Nov20110947@archer.parc.xerox.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!xylogics!bu.edu!att!cbfsb!cbnewsc!lgm From: lgm@cbnewsc.att.com (lawrence.g.mayka) Newsgroups: comp.lang.clos Subject: Re: Is CLOS Object-Oriented ??? Summary: Smalltalk has instVar:at: Message-ID: <1990Nov22.012750.5098@cbnewsc.att.com> Date: 22 Nov 90 01:27:50 GMT References: <1990Nov15.101847.26285@diku.dk> <3786@skye.ed.ac.uk> <LANNING.90Nov20110947@archer.parc.xerox.com> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories Lines: 15