🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1990Nov27.023907.10083@athena.mit.edu> janson@athena.mit.edu (James A Anderson) writes:
>does anyone know why the arguments are reversed in the function
>which is generated by a defmethod for a setf function?

This is so that the <place> argument to SETF may include keyword, optional,
and rest parameters.  If the <value> argument were last it wouldn't be
possible to precede it with optional or keyword arguments.  The method
might need to specialize on the type of the value argument, but only
positional arguments may be specialized.  And no arguments can follow
keyword arguments.

So, it's not really the case that the arguments are *reversed*.  The
arguments are in the same order, except that the value argument is moved to
the front.

For a simple example, consider the function that SETF of AREF must expand
into a call of (in Zetalisp it's called ASET).  It should take the
subscripts as an &rest argument just as AREF does.  So where does the value
argument go.  In Zetalisp, the argument list is (new-value array &rest
subscripts).

--
Barry Margolin, Thinking Machines Corp.

barmar@think.com
{uunet,harvard}!think!barmar