🚀 go-pugleaf

What were you thinking of?  functions names like G-MAKE-ARRAY, G-AREF, and
so on instead of MAKE-ARRAY and AREF?  I don't believe there is any "party
line" on such matters.

Common Lisp implementation don't "support" generic functions where the
function in question is documented as non-generic (as, for example, AREF
is non-generic).  But for any other documented generic functions, such as
DESCRIBE-OBJECT, INITIALIZE-INSTANCE, and so on -- well, you would just put
a method on those functions specialized to your class *** without regard
to the fact that your class is totally unrelated to the other classes upon
which there are direct methods for that generic function.



-- JonL --