Article View: comp.lang.clos
Article #314Fate of obsolete accessors
From: Jeff Dalton
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 13:15
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 13:15
12 lines
820 bytes
820 bytes
Suppose I 1. Define a class with a slot A, :acessor GET-A. 2. Redefine the class w/o the alot A. What happens to the access method on the generic function GET-A? In PCL the method goes away. But is this behavior guaranteed? What if the method was redefined to no longer be a slot access between (1) and (2)? -- jd
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<22504.9210121315@subnode.aiai.ed.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!aiai.edinburgh.ac.uk!jeffShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!aiai.edinburgh.ac.uk!jeff From: jeff@aiai.edinburgh.ac.uk (Jeff Dalton) Newsgroups: comp.lang.clos Subject: Fate of obsolete accessors Message-ID: <22504.9210121315@subnode.aiai.ed.ac.uk> Date: 12 Oct 92 13:15:54 GMT Sender: daemon@cis.ohio-state.edu Organization: The Ohio State University Department of Computer and Information Science Lines: 12