🚀 go-pugleaf

> In my response to jonl@lucid, I suggest that a good interim solution from a
> user's point of view might be to define some subset of a MOP that just
> deals with modifications to standard-class, without admitting to metaclasses
> that are independent of standard-class. This would involve dictating that
> any subclass of standard-class is compatible with standard-class. I
> believe that this is reasonable.

I think this may well be a good idea (despite my disagreement with
the "major players" approach in another message).  (It's the process
of approval, rather than the suggesiton itself, I have some trouble
with.)

-- jeff