Article View: comp.lang.clos
Article #47(none)
From: john
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 14:37
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 14:37
15 lines
871 bytes
871 bytes
kanderso@bbn.com writes:
... how do I exit from a primary method such that :AFTER method
are skipped? I'd like to avoid use of THROW and non-standard
method combination. Is it possible?
Use an :AROUND method. Do you consider than non-standard?
No, but do you mean an :AROUND to CATCH the THROW from the primary? I
think the idea was to avoid non-standard method combination and *also*
avoid THROW, not just avoid the combination of the two.
John Burger
john@mitre.org
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9207282237.AA10971@thelonius.mitre.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!linus.mitre.org!johnShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.lang.clos Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!linus.mitre.org!john From: john@linus.mitre.org Subject: (none) Message-ID: <9207282237.AA10971@thelonius.mitre.org> Sender: daemon@cis.ohio-state.edu Organization: The Ohio State University Department of Computer and Information Science Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 14:37:25 GMT Lines: 15