Article View: comp.lang.clos
Article #511(none)
From: Jon L White
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 1991 21:23
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 1991 21:23
13 lines
1070 bytes
1070 bytes
re: do you have a lucid-low.lisp for version 4.0 of lucid? No need to, unless performace tweaking is of high priority. The only thing you have to be careful about is that CLOS symbols will conflict with PCL symbols -- the former are externals of the LUCID-COMMON-LISP package (as well as of the CLOS package), and the latter are in the PCL package. Many people will import PCL symbols into application packages, and the importation step mail fail in 4.0 where it didn't in 3.0; the solution of course is to use shadowing-import, or to use fully- qualified references. -- JonL --
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9104162123.AA12622@kuwait>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!bionet!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unreplyable!garbageReferences:
<9104161908.AA09104@vax135.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!bionet!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unreplyable!garbage From: jonl%kuwait@LUCID.COM (Jon L White) Newsgroups: comp.lang.clos Subject: (none) Message-ID: <9104162123.AA12622@kuwait> Date: 16 Apr 91 21:23:08 GMT References: <9104161908.AA09104@vax135.UUCP> Sender: welch@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu Distribution: inet Organization: CommonLoops Lines: 13