🚀 go-pugleaf

Kazimir Kylheku (c2a192@ugrad.cs.ubc.ca) wrote:
: In article <4kkkbm$4ld@news4.digex.net>, Ell <ell@access4.digex.net> wrote:
: >You are in "hell" when don't see the existence and importance of
: >Object-Oriented Analysis (OOA), in my opinion.  But that is nature of some
: >types in the OO arena. 
 
: The OO arena is a philosophical one. I don't particularly subscribe to the view
: that there ought to be a naive correspondence between software entities and
: some ``real world'' entities, except when it's utterly convenient, and on
: the third Wednesday of every month.
: 
: The whole thing is a little childish and naive when taken too far.

You are ascribing to my ideas positions which are not mine.  And then you 
attack what you ascribe to me.  Such as what you are saying is a straw 
man.  If you read my article "Analysis Drives Development" in the Nov/Dec 
issue of Object, I describe how I see the relationship between the real 
world and a OOD.  Very clean, clear and precise, imo.  Based on years of 
my own and others experience.  Very non-naive, imo, as it discusses using 
use cases, design patterns and M/V/C.

Elliott